28 May 2012

Ever-Expanding Participation, Part the Last


Howdy, and welcome to Part 3 of my paper investigating the integration of Theology & Mission.

I hope that anyone who has taken the time to read through so far has found a more holistic Trinitarian theology (not merely a sending one, or one focused too much on one Person) to be helpful.  I hope it encourages us to know the communal Godhead is always wholly involved with us and with Creation.  I also hope that it will inform our own actions as Humanity as well as the Church.

May the shalom of the Holy Trinity, the peace of the Lord Christ, go with you, wherever the Spirit may send you.

---------------------------------------
II.  The Implication
            The Church as both object and agent of the Triune Mission has two responses missio Dei:  First, the Church worships God; and second, the Church seeks the shalom of the city in which it resides, with the purpose of making disciples.  The second response has been somewhat described above.  The exhortation by the prophet Jeremiah (29.7) comes to a nation that has found itself brought to a strange context, Babylon.  Strange may be an understatement—the people of God had been broken, defeated, and displaced from their homeland by the Babylonians.  They were the enemy.  And yet, Jeremiah’s word from the LORD told them to actively seek out the life and blessing of Babylon!
            What this gives the Church today is a decree that God is about blessing all nations through his people.  God does not say, “Take over the government of Babylon and make the Law their law.”  God tells Judah, “Live as my people in their city, for their benefit, and you too will be given shalom.”  This message meshes with the earlier-quoted “great commission.”  Jesus told his disciples to “Go and make disciples.”  “Go” is not an imperative, but literally translated would say, “as you are going about” (my translation).[1]  It implies that the disciples will all go about living their lives, but as they do, they must make disciples.  Add to this Philippians 1.27:
“Only, live your life in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that, whether I come and see you or am absent and hear about you, I will know that you are standing firm in one spirit, striving side by side with one mind for the faith of the gospel.”  (NRSV)

The verb translated “live your life” implies one who is involved in social, political, and economic realms of the society in which they live.  To live worthy of the gospel of Christ, to live in a way that will allow the Church to make disciples, the Church must engage society in all of its realms and forms.
            The other response of the Church to the missio Dei is one with which the Church has always been familiar, but which could use fresh perspective.  In this realm John Piper has gained great popularity—his book connecting missions and worship has sold over 185,000 copies—even being quoted in a popular Christian rap song by the artist Lecrae,[2] by this proclamation:  “Missions is not the ultimate goal of the Church.  Worship is.  Missions exist because worship doesn’t.”[3]  As the rest of this paper has shown, Mission is part of the Trinity’s very nature, and therefore exists because of God—not because of some lack of Worship within Creation.  
            Bosch provides an image by which the Church may understand the connection of Mission and Worship: “an ellipse with two foci.”[4]  An ellipse is an elongated circle, an oval.  In mathematical terms, the size and shape of an ellipse are determined by it two separate points of focus.  In the same way, Worship and Mission create two points of focus for the Church that determine the shape of her faith.  Bosch gives more depth to the image by adding motion:  “The church gathers to praise God, to enjoy fellowship and receive spiritual sustenance, and disperses to serve God wherever its members are.”[5]  Worship and mission both influence the Church in how she acts out her faith, and placing one higher than the other (as Piper does) does neither justice.  If any church community focuses upon Worship for the sake of Worship (“We worship because we were made to”) or on Mission for the sake of Mission (“We must obey the ‘great commission’” or “We just need to help people”), then that body’s vision will go to that focal point and no further.  All else will necessarily become peripheral.  Worship will build upon itself to support more Worship—an unstable foundation where most of a church’s energy goes into Sunday worship, i.e. many megachurch services.  Mission will have to provide meaning for more Mission, removing depth and robustness from the Body, and becoming a set of works and stratagems.
            However, what if the Church allowed each of these focal points to highlight the distant direction of her faith?  Light coming from any one point travels two different paths from two different angles when any human focuses upon it with their two eyes:  It is that different perspective, that other path, that gives the image depth, dimension and substance.  What if Worship and Mission both were markers for the Church to find a greater, more far-sighted vision?  That far-sighted vision is the eschatological Kingdom and Reign of God, and Worship and Mission are the evidences of it in the here and now.  They are the signposts by which we must navigate to bring the Kingdom into reality today.
            A Church that recognizes this can then act it out in a number of ways.  First, worshipping Christians will recognize the intimate link means that their Worship affects their daily lives, and their daily lives affect their Worship.  Take the story of Jesus in Mark 11, when Jesus cleansed the temple:  Jesus, incensed, flipped the temple structures on their head and completely stopped the economic transactions taking place in this place of Worship.  Jesus emphatically states through his action that “without justice there could be no worship.”[6]
            The Church can also respond by bringing narratives, stories, into the center of Worship.  The worship meals in Corinth consisted of small gatherings around the table of someone’s home.  The meals were followed by each participant giving whatever “word” or story had been given to them:  They, in essence, would share a testimony.[7]  Not a story of one’s conversion, as many Western Christians define "testimony" today, but a testimony to the power of God at work in their daily life.  The Church today already continues its retelling of the “big story”—the one about God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Israel, covenant, exile, incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, and ongoing redemption—but the Church should also encourage its participants in worship to share the “new chapters of the story that are being written in lives, communities, and nations throughout the world.”[8]
            Elaine Heath, in The Mystic Way of Evangelism, shows how mystic Christians have understood evangelism in the past—that it is in fact a holistic Mission, not merely a statement that can fit on a pamphlet:  "Evangelism is intrinsically relational, the outcome of love of neighbor, for to love our neighbor is to share the love of God holistically.  The proper context for evangelism is authentic Christian community, where the expression of loving community is the greatest apologetic for the gospel."[1]  The first use of the word from which we get “mysticism” actually describes the “mystery” of the revelation of the Triune God in Jesus Christ (see Colossian 1.26-7).[2]  For these Christians, their life was “a continual movement of the heart seeking to transcend the limitations of the individual standpoint” and to participate in life communally with the Triune God.[3]  The church needs to re-learn this lesson today, as Heath explains in greater detail. 
            Our understanding of Mission must come from our understanding of the Trinity, and, if it does, then we will see a Church in loving community with all Humankind, with all created things, seeking the shalom of all so that all may worship.  If the Church can do this, then “that language of Love, understood by all, will be pouring forth its unconscious eloquence.  It is the man who is the missionary, it is not his words.  His character is his message.”[4]



[1] The word for “go” is in the Greek a circumstantial participle of time.
[2] “Send Me” by Lecrae, After the Music Stops (Reach Records, 2006).
[3] John Piper, Let the Nations be Glad! The Supremacy of God in Missions (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1993), 17.
[4] Bosch, 395.
[5] Ibid., 395.
[6] Kreider, Alan and Eleanor Kreider, Worship & Mission After Christendom (Scottsdale: Herald Press, 2001), 33.
[7] Ibid., 101.
[8] Ibid., 82.


[1] Elaine Heath, The Mystic Way of Evangelism (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008), 13.
[2] Ibid., 15.
[3] Evelyn Underhill, Mysticism (New York: Meridian, 1955), 71.
[4] Henry Drummond, The Greatest Thing in the World (New York: The Peter Pauper Press), 17.


20 May 2012

Ever-Expanding Participation, Part II


Howdy people!  Here's part 2 of my Integration of Theology & Mission, focusing on the Church in the midst of a Creation whose Creator is by nature communal, relational, and therefore missional.  The last part will be more practically-minded, the actions that follow the worldview I've been spelling out.  

In the first post, I defended how a missional Church must begin their theology with the Trinity.  Each Person has always been involved in Creation, has been participating with the other Persons in Creation, and therefore the Church has been invited and called into this communal, missional act.  The focus is not merely some individualistic view of relation with only one Individual of the Trinity (Jesus).  Because participation and self-donation are inherent in the nature of the Trinity, and therefore determine the identity of any one Person in it, these characteristics are what the Church needs to embody to perpetuate the missio Dei.

Hope you find this to be a blessing today.  Grace & Peace

-----------------------------
            Where does this leave the Church?  If the entirety of the Trinity is actively being missional within the world, then it would seem that the Church is not strictly necessary for the missio Dei.  And if the Church does not have a monopoly on God’s salvific work, then it would seem that the Church may only get in the way.  However, the Church still has a central role to play in the missio Dei, and it is based entirely on the participatory nature of God.
            The Church is a missional paradox.  Historically in the Western World, the Church has claimed to be the vessel through which Christ’s salvation came to the world; and yet the Church has often found itself acting detrimentally to that very mission.[1]  David Bosch calls the Church itself “an object of missio Dei.”[2]  Christians remain humans, and so they must continually be renewed by repentance into new creaturely habits of heart and mind, just as Paul encourages the churches:
“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God—what is good and acceptable and perfect.” (Rom 12.2 NRSV)

“So we do not lose heart.  Even though our outer nature is wasting away, our inner nature is being renewed bay by day.” (2 Cor 4.16 NRSV)

“So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation:  Everything old has passed away; see, everything has become new.  All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation.” (2 Cor 5.17-18 NRSV)

Bosch further reminds his readers that “Paul, who knew so much about the weaknesses of the churches to which he wrote his letters, began nearly every time by thanking God for their existence, their faith, their loyalty”[3] (i.e. Rom 1.8; 1 Cor 1.4-9; Eph 1.15-16; Phil 1.3-7; Col 1.3-4; 1 Thess 1.2-3; 2 Thess 1.3-4).  The Church, paradoxically, is both imperfect object and transforming agent of Mission:  Having been reconciled and in the process of being continually renewed, the Church also acts out the reconciliation and the continual renewing of the missio Dei.  The Triune God, by God’s own relational nature, is glorified by participating with the Church as a bride (Rev 21.9), entering into the Church as she empties herself for the greater glory of both.
            The Exodus narrative illustrates this participatory God with his people, Israel.  In Exodus 6 God promises to redeem his people, and God is celebrated in Exodus 15 for having done so.  The root word for each of these is tied to the idea of a “kinsman redeemer,” which “affirms a bond between [God} and Israel that is as close and as committed as any bond of human kinship, and with it YHWH accepts the obligation that comes from taking Israel as his own family.”[4]  This is the doctrine of election—God invited a people into a communal relationship because that is the nature of the Trinity.  The Hebrew Bible testifies to the participation of both God and Israel present in the call of Abram:
‘Now YHWH said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you.  I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you, and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing.”’ (Gen 12.1-2 NRSV)

The very act of God calling Abram, making a covenant with him, blessing Abram, and sending him into another land was presupposed by the idea that Abram would bless those around him.  Abram must reflect the self-donating love inherent in the very nature of the Triune God who called him, and the nation of Israel after him is given the same command, even in exile.
“And seek the shalom of the city to which I have exiled you, and pray on its behalf to YHWH, for in its shalom there will be shalom for you.” (Jer 29.7)[5]

            The shalom of the LORD should not be restricted to humanity, however.  The entirety of Creation is interacting with the Triune God:
‘Then God said to Noah and to his sons with him, “As for me, I am establishing my covenant with you and your descendants after you, and with every living creature on earth.”’  (Gen 9.10)

“I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory about to be revealed to us.  For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God; for the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will but by the will of the one who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.”  (Rom 8. 18-21 NRSV)

It seems that God has intentionally held Creation back, and it awaits the “children of God”—the Church, by way of being grafted into Israel (Romans 11.1-4, 11-12, 17-18).  So, as the Church continues to proclaim the name of the LORD and make room for the Triune God’s power, Creation itself should be the recipient of the blessing, just as every human being should be. 
            This then brings Mission to the Cross.  N. T. Wright connects the Kingdom of God with the missio Dei, then he plainly describes how “Kingdom and Cross belong together.”[6]  Wright affirms the purpose of Humanity to bear God’s image, the special election of Israel for the sake of Human’s redemption, and Jesus Christ’s completion of that redemptive task on the Cross.[7]  Not only did Jesus redeem Human, but he also bore the weight of the “the accumulation of the actual human pride, sin, folly, and shame.”[8]  Then through death Christ defeated Death, and through his Resurrection gained power and authority over it all—a power and authority the Church now has through Christ against Death and all its continuing forms, like oppression, hunger, hate, war, inequality, etc:
“When you were buried with him in baptism, you were also raised with him through faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead.  And when you were dead in trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made you alive together with him, when he forgave us all our trespasses, erasing the record that stood against us with its legal demands.  He set this aside, nailing it to the Cross.  He disarmed the rulers and authorities and made a public example of them, triumphing over them in it.”  (Col 2.12-15 NRSV)

The Church, in proclaiming the Kingdom of God, is also meant to be an agent of its coming; and this Kingdom, this “reign of YHWH,” brings justice to the oppressed (Isa 61.1), food for the hungry (Matt 25.34-40), peace to the nations (Isaiah 2.2-4), and economic prosperity for all people (Isa 61.2; Luke 4.19).[9]  This is what Christ died for; this was “the joy set before him” for which he “endured the cross” (Heb 12.2 NRSV).  And this is the work of the Trinity in all of Creation into which the Church is invited to become co-workers with the Triune God (3 John 8).  In addition, the Cross is also that which has created One Body out of many:  Those found in Christ have been unified through the suffering LORD, and therefore the Church bears that Cross and that Christ in the world by her actions, by her very habits of heart and mind.[10]


[1] See Bosch ch. 7-9, and Bevans & Schroeder ch.
[2] Bosch, 396.
[3] Bosch, 394.
[4] Christopher J. H.Wright, The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative, Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press (2006), 266-7.
[5] Ibid., 99.
[6] N. T. Wright, After You Believe: Why Christian Character Matters (New York: HarperOne, 2010), 114.
[7] Ibid., 112.
[8] Ibid., 114.
[9] C. J. H. Wright, 309.
[10] Volf, 47.

15 May 2012

Ever-Expanding Participation, Part I


Howdy all!  Grace & Peace.

I just finished an assignment for class that I felt like posting.  It is an integration of theology and mission, which seemed pretty practical to me, and was something I felt a little passionate about.  So I think it fits the blog pretty well.  It's rather long, so I'll be breaking it up into pieces (probably 3), which I'll post over the next few days.

Ever-Expanding Participation
Christianity's on-going conversation about the purpose and nature of Mission has come to the forefront of both the practical and doctrinal minds of the Church, as evidenced by the recent explosion of the use of the word “missional” in a variety of Christian contexts.[1]  The theological paradigm of Mission is in flux.  Some insist that theology is unnecessary—it is the practice of mission, of mercy, of grace that matters.  But what Christians believe and emphasize about God affects how they view the world, and how Christians view the world determines how they interact with it.  A robust theology that emphasizes the relational and communal nature of the Triune God, specifically in the act of participation, will provide a definition of Mission both historical and practical, and it will show how Mission as a part of the Trinity’s very nature has been active since the moment of Creation.  From this point must every missional action of the Church be informed.

I.  The Theology
            “There is nothing more elusive than an obvious fact.”
In the first account of Creation found in Genesis, the NRSV translates verse 2 as “the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters.”  That word “wind” has most often been translated “Spirit of God.”  Interestingly, the Greek word translated Spirit in the New Testament also has the same primary meanings of “breath” or “wind,” just as the Hebrew does.  This linguistic history, and the history of the theology behind it, gives Christians precedent to tie the doctrine of the Trinity to the very act of Creation.  God the Father is present as “Elohim,” the Spirit is present and called “wind”—and both Paul and John depict God the Son as also an agent of Creation:
“Yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist” (1 Cor. 8.6 NRSV). 

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  He was in the beginning with God.  All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being.”  (John 1.1-3 NRSV)

The whole of Christian memory and tradition seems to show all three Persons of the Trinity to be active from the very beginning of Creation; many recent Christian theologians, however, have missed this very important image. 
            Study of the Trinity found new life in the 20th century, sparked in part by the tragedy of the Second World War and the expulsion of missionaries from now-Communist China, and it sought to redefine Mission by determining how the Triune God acts with Creation as pictured in the paragraph above.[2]  Karl Barth produced an entire ecclesiology on the notion that God is a God who sends even within God’s Triune self:  God the Father sends God the Son, who both then send God the Holy Spirit, and the three of them send the Church into the world.[3]  This puts Mission squarely into the realm of the nature of God.  Evidence of this view is prevalent in Christian writings from Tertullian to Pope John Paul II.[4]  The central passage for this view of Mission is what became known as the “great commission”: 
“And Jesus came and said to them, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.  Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you.  And remember, I am with you always, to the end of the age’” (Matthew 28.19-20 NRSV). 

The word traditionally emphasized here is “go,” most often with an exclamation point at the end as if it were an imperative (which it is not, in Greek) that urged disciples to themselves be sent.  But, Van Gelder and Zscheile critique a linear emphasis of divine sending by showing how it diminishes the agency of God by making the Church as the primary agent in Creation.[5]  God the Father, in this view, has no direct agency in salvation, but is only related through the mediators of Christ and Church, the Body of Christ.
            Another consequence of this restricted view inordinately emphasizes individualism and hierarchy by focusing more on Jesus than the Trinity itself.  Mark Driscoll is a prime example of this movement, continually espousing “a simple return to Jesus”[6] as the starting point of Trinitarian theology.  It is an approach that is highly attractive in its simplicity and in how well it fits with modern Western individualistic culture, but it also distances God the Father from Creation, reduces the agency of God the Holy Spirit, and makes Mission into a mere discipline garnered from the example of Jesus as opposed to part of the nature of the Trinity—and therefore part of God's work from the very beginning.[7]  So, Christians are taught to emphasize their individual relationship with the individual Christ, and that the salvation of the Father comes to the world exclusively through the Church through the Spirit through the Son. 
            In response to this common paradigm of the missio Dei, the Church should start not from Jesus only but from the Trinity through an “epistemology of participation.”[8]  Returning to Jesus' own words in John 5: 
“Very truly I tell you the Son can do nothing on his own, but only what he sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise… I can do nothing on my own.  As I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just, because I seek to do not my own will but the will of him who sent me” (vv. 19, 30 NRSV).

Jesus, the Son, testifies here to being sent by the Father, so this language should not be discounted in Trinitarian discussion.  However, he explicitly states that he can only do what he sees the Father doing.  Jesus understands that God the Father is continuously active in this world (not reduced to merely sending), and Jesus’ own will is to follow after the present actions of the Father.  The Spirit is not to be counted out in this work:  Mark’s gospel mentions the Holy Spirit's actions three times in the first twelve verses, culminating in verse 12 by saying,
“And the Spirit immediately drove him [Jesus] out into the wilderness” (NRSV).
Before Jesus has begun his ministry, the Spirit is actively leading Jesus in the wilderness of the world, not merely one sent after Jesus has later ascended into heaven.  All Persons within the Trinity were active at the foundation of the world, were active in Jesus’ earthly ministry, and continue to be active simultaneously in the world today.
            The Three Persons do not act separately but with a nature of participation.  Jesus did not claim to do any single thing on his own, but was directed by both the Father and the Spirit.  The participation of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit determines how the Persons interact with each other as One God, and this relational manner can be called “self-donation.”  This theory is one in which “the self contracts to be expanded by the other, and we enter into the other’s contracted self in order to increase the other’s plentitude.”[9]  Jesus here does give an example to which we can return of the Trinitarian relationship:  Jesus empties himself of his own will, allowing God the Father and God the Holy Spirit to expand their power and will into that now empty space.  This results in Jesus willingly submitting to each of them, allowing both Father and Spirit to be glorified; but instead of this ending in a diminishment of the Son, the Son is filled by the other Persons and eventually brought to greater glory himself (John 17.1; Romans 6.4).  Each Person in the Trinity repeats this action, making the identity of each completely determined by the relationship of the communal whole.  This is the love relationship to which the author of 1 John referred by saying that “God is love” (4.8 NRSV).  The Trinity loves by each Person continually emptying their own self to be filled to a greater amount by the Others as they each spread out—an ever-expanding love relationship that is the foundation of Creation.


[1] Craig Van Gelder & Dwight J. Zscheile, The Missional Church in Perspective: Mapping Trends and Shaping the Conversation (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011), 1.
[2] David J. Bosch, Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission—Twentieth Anniversary Edition (New York: Orbis Books, 2011), 379.
[3] Craig Van Gelder and Dwight J. Zscheile, The Missional Church in Perspective: Mapping Trends and Shaping the Conversation, (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011), 26.
[4] Stephen B. Bevans and Roger P. Schroeder, Constants in Context: A Theology of Mission for Today (Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 2004), 38, 41.
[5] Van Gelder & Zscheile, 75.
[6] Mark Driscoll, Confessions of a Reformission Rev.: Hard Lessons from an Emerging Missional Church (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006), 15.
[7] Van Gelder & Zscheile, 80.
[8] Bosch, 371.
[9] Miroslav Volf, Exclusion & Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996).

04 May 2012

Whirlwind of Trust

Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind,
     "Gird up your loins like a man..."—Job 40.6-7a

Nearly two and one-half years have passed since my whirlwind.  A relationship that I thought had a future ran off without any explanation; understanding wouldn't come for another year or so.  Immediately after that, I found out that I had failed a final exam, which failed me in that class, which failed me right out of college.

Yeah, I had hit one hell of a whirlwind.

The rest of that story takes a while to tell, and maybe I will later.  It actually runs right up to the beginning of this blog.  For now, know that for a little over a month (could it have been 40 days?) I was listless, without a clue what future lay before me.  I felt like reading Job would help; I'm not sure why.

But I did read it, and, when I did, that line quoted at the top (also from Job 38.1) hooked me.  I couldn't get away from it.  "Whirlwind... That sounds exactly like what I've fallen into.  And God answered Job from it."

God often is depicted as something powerful, out of (human) control, or all-consuming whenever God shows up in the world (called "theophany").  Like in Jeremiah 23.19, or when God tells Moses that he cannot look on God's face without it destroying him, or the pillar of fire that led Israel from Egypt; Hebrews even chimes in with, "It is a fearful, terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God."

And so, God is in this whirlwind.  But, Job isn't destroyed.  God in fact replies to Job; God is moved to respond to his human servant's cry.  Granted, neither of God's replies (1 in 38-39, 2 in 40-41) seem to answer Job's questions or accusations.  I claim, however, that they give Job an encouragement to trust in God.

If you read Job's speeches throughout the book, you will see an interesting movement.  At first he responds to his suffering with "But the LORD gives and the LORD takes away; blessed be the LORD."  But then we get to 27.5: "Til I die I will not put away my integrity from me!" And then 31.6: "Let me be weighed in a just balance, and let God know my integrity!"... As if Job knows himself to be righteous, and God can't figure it out.

Job continually spirals around the drain of his own self-absorption, even to the point of annihilation when he curses the very day he was born (3.1).

Here's an interesting question:  Did Job—does anybody—even have the ability to get out of that spiral once such great grief has grasped us?

The cultures surrounding Israel in the Ancient Near East wrote stories about a suffering man being met by his god as well, so what light can they shed on the context of the biblical Job?  Kirta from Ugarit is one, and A Dialogue Between a Man and his God from Babylon is another.  Interestingly, in both of these, when the god arrives his first action is to meet the needs of the suffering one:  The god in the Babylonian story brings the Man food and clothes and healing ointment, and the Ugaritic god El offers Kirta power or wealth (although Kirta really wants a family; this makes it seem like the god El is clueless about what's going on).  The 2nd story made me think of Ron Burgandy in Anchorman saying, "If I were to give you money out of my wallet, would that help ease the pain?"

It's funny, then, for us Christians to look at our God and say, "He is so much more merciful and loving than these other gods" when God doesn't give Job anything when he arrives.  He in effect tells Job, "Put your big boy pants on."

However, I argue that this was a much more beautiful solution than either of the aforementioned parallels could comprehend.  In God's responses, we see God take very seriously Job's accusations.  God doesn't directly answer Job's questions, but God DOES use much of the language Job himself uses throughout in a direct response to the movement of Job's heart and mind.

As I said earlier, Job moves ever inward into himself and his grief.  God reverses that movement by responding to Job with the panorama of Creation:  The images of God stretching out the heavens, holding back the waters, creating pair after pair of animals all parade before Job.  .  God's response was meant to first re-orient Job's very faith in God, in God's providence, in God's power, to let God back into the central place of Job's worldview... not to scare Job speechless as it so often is claimed.

Now look at God's second response to Job—40.15: "Look at Behemoth, which I made just as I made you."  God is pointing to an animal and telling Job that God made it just as He made Job—this creature is going to be an example of how Job can relate to God.

Behemoth is powerful:  Interesting that its power is derived from its loins (v.16), the same loins God told Job to "gird up" (v.7).  Behemoth is peaceful, an herbivore.  Behemoth is provided food by the mountain, and given shade by the marsh.

And, "even if the river is turbulent, it is not frightened; it is confident though Jordan rushes against its mouth." (Job 40.23)

God exemplifies this creature, a creature just as Job is a creature, as one who is given what it needs and that responds with confidence and not fear even when the River, the Chaos (because waters and rivers commonly referred to the Chaos which God ordered at Creation—look for the word "waters" in Genesis 1.2), rushes against it.

The Babylonian A Dialogue Between a Man and his God supports this, too, curiously enough.  It also uses that ever-so-interesting-yet-confounding phrase, "Gird up your loins."  In line 48 of that poem, it says, "Gird you loins, do not be dispirited."  It's not a phrase of calling one out—it's a phrase meant to encourage.  It's God grabbing Job by the shoulders, shaking him, and telling him to snap out of his self-absorption because that only leads to nothingness.  God wants to replace that nothingness with God-centered, Other-centered, Creation-centered life, and Job can trust in God's power to sustain that life.

And that, my friends, is exactly the place in which I landed when hit with my whirlwind.  It was the strangest thing, but I never panicked after the first couple of days.  I just knew I'd keep walking, I'd keep breathing, and that God would sustain me as long as I did.

And although I healed, I did so with scars.  And I still deal with relationship issues.  But I did get to finish my degree, and now I'm in grad school.  I have been given a story to tell, as Job continues to tell his.  Not to say mine is anything on par with his, but it is my story, and God is still running the show.

So I'll leave you with one biblical parallel, one that many know but did not know that it related to Job in the least.  I'll let you work out some connections, and I hope they encourage you as they have me.

May we be strong enough to trust God in the midst of Chaos, even strong enough to call God out, in whatever way need be, so that God might respond to us and pull us out of the ever-pulling vortex of our own self-absorption.  May we, when faced with tempests that seem like they'll consume us, look for the word God has for us within it.  Grace & Peace.

Isaiah 40.24-31

24“Scarcely are they planted, scarcely sown, scarcely has their stem taken root in the earth, when he blows upon them, and they wither, and the tempest carries them off like stubble.
                  25To whom then will you compare me, or who is my equal? says the Holy One.
26Lift up your eyes on high and see:  Who created these?  He who brings out their host and numbers them, calling them all by name; because he is great in strength, mighty in power, not one is missing.
                  27Why do you say, O Jacob, and speak, O Israel, “My way is hidden from the LORD, and my right is disregarded by my God”?
28Have you not known?  Have you not heard?  The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth.  He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable.
                  29He gives power to the faint, and strengthens the powerless.
30Even youth will faint and be weary, and the young will fall exhausted;
                  31but those who wait for the LORD shall renew their strength, they shall mount up with wings like eagles, they shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint.