28 May 2012

Ever-Expanding Participation, Part the Last


Howdy, and welcome to Part 3 of my paper investigating the integration of Theology & Mission.

I hope that anyone who has taken the time to read through so far has found a more holistic Trinitarian theology (not merely a sending one, or one focused too much on one Person) to be helpful.  I hope it encourages us to know the communal Godhead is always wholly involved with us and with Creation.  I also hope that it will inform our own actions as Humanity as well as the Church.

May the shalom of the Holy Trinity, the peace of the Lord Christ, go with you, wherever the Spirit may send you.

---------------------------------------
II.  The Implication
            The Church as both object and agent of the Triune Mission has two responses missio Dei:  First, the Church worships God; and second, the Church seeks the shalom of the city in which it resides, with the purpose of making disciples.  The second response has been somewhat described above.  The exhortation by the prophet Jeremiah (29.7) comes to a nation that has found itself brought to a strange context, Babylon.  Strange may be an understatement—the people of God had been broken, defeated, and displaced from their homeland by the Babylonians.  They were the enemy.  And yet, Jeremiah’s word from the LORD told them to actively seek out the life and blessing of Babylon!
            What this gives the Church today is a decree that God is about blessing all nations through his people.  God does not say, “Take over the government of Babylon and make the Law their law.”  God tells Judah, “Live as my people in their city, for their benefit, and you too will be given shalom.”  This message meshes with the earlier-quoted “great commission.”  Jesus told his disciples to “Go and make disciples.”  “Go” is not an imperative, but literally translated would say, “as you are going about” (my translation).[1]  It implies that the disciples will all go about living their lives, but as they do, they must make disciples.  Add to this Philippians 1.27:
“Only, live your life in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that, whether I come and see you or am absent and hear about you, I will know that you are standing firm in one spirit, striving side by side with one mind for the faith of the gospel.”  (NRSV)

The verb translated “live your life” implies one who is involved in social, political, and economic realms of the society in which they live.  To live worthy of the gospel of Christ, to live in a way that will allow the Church to make disciples, the Church must engage society in all of its realms and forms.
            The other response of the Church to the missio Dei is one with which the Church has always been familiar, but which could use fresh perspective.  In this realm John Piper has gained great popularity—his book connecting missions and worship has sold over 185,000 copies—even being quoted in a popular Christian rap song by the artist Lecrae,[2] by this proclamation:  “Missions is not the ultimate goal of the Church.  Worship is.  Missions exist because worship doesn’t.”[3]  As the rest of this paper has shown, Mission is part of the Trinity’s very nature, and therefore exists because of God—not because of some lack of Worship within Creation.  
            Bosch provides an image by which the Church may understand the connection of Mission and Worship: “an ellipse with two foci.”[4]  An ellipse is an elongated circle, an oval.  In mathematical terms, the size and shape of an ellipse are determined by it two separate points of focus.  In the same way, Worship and Mission create two points of focus for the Church that determine the shape of her faith.  Bosch gives more depth to the image by adding motion:  “The church gathers to praise God, to enjoy fellowship and receive spiritual sustenance, and disperses to serve God wherever its members are.”[5]  Worship and mission both influence the Church in how she acts out her faith, and placing one higher than the other (as Piper does) does neither justice.  If any church community focuses upon Worship for the sake of Worship (“We worship because we were made to”) or on Mission for the sake of Mission (“We must obey the ‘great commission’” or “We just need to help people”), then that body’s vision will go to that focal point and no further.  All else will necessarily become peripheral.  Worship will build upon itself to support more Worship—an unstable foundation where most of a church’s energy goes into Sunday worship, i.e. many megachurch services.  Mission will have to provide meaning for more Mission, removing depth and robustness from the Body, and becoming a set of works and stratagems.
            However, what if the Church allowed each of these focal points to highlight the distant direction of her faith?  Light coming from any one point travels two different paths from two different angles when any human focuses upon it with their two eyes:  It is that different perspective, that other path, that gives the image depth, dimension and substance.  What if Worship and Mission both were markers for the Church to find a greater, more far-sighted vision?  That far-sighted vision is the eschatological Kingdom and Reign of God, and Worship and Mission are the evidences of it in the here and now.  They are the signposts by which we must navigate to bring the Kingdom into reality today.
            A Church that recognizes this can then act it out in a number of ways.  First, worshipping Christians will recognize the intimate link means that their Worship affects their daily lives, and their daily lives affect their Worship.  Take the story of Jesus in Mark 11, when Jesus cleansed the temple:  Jesus, incensed, flipped the temple structures on their head and completely stopped the economic transactions taking place in this place of Worship.  Jesus emphatically states through his action that “without justice there could be no worship.”[6]
            The Church can also respond by bringing narratives, stories, into the center of Worship.  The worship meals in Corinth consisted of small gatherings around the table of someone’s home.  The meals were followed by each participant giving whatever “word” or story had been given to them:  They, in essence, would share a testimony.[7]  Not a story of one’s conversion, as many Western Christians define "testimony" today, but a testimony to the power of God at work in their daily life.  The Church today already continues its retelling of the “big story”—the one about God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Israel, covenant, exile, incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, and ongoing redemption—but the Church should also encourage its participants in worship to share the “new chapters of the story that are being written in lives, communities, and nations throughout the world.”[8]
            Elaine Heath, in The Mystic Way of Evangelism, shows how mystic Christians have understood evangelism in the past—that it is in fact a holistic Mission, not merely a statement that can fit on a pamphlet:  "Evangelism is intrinsically relational, the outcome of love of neighbor, for to love our neighbor is to share the love of God holistically.  The proper context for evangelism is authentic Christian community, where the expression of loving community is the greatest apologetic for the gospel."[1]  The first use of the word from which we get “mysticism” actually describes the “mystery” of the revelation of the Triune God in Jesus Christ (see Colossian 1.26-7).[2]  For these Christians, their life was “a continual movement of the heart seeking to transcend the limitations of the individual standpoint” and to participate in life communally with the Triune God.[3]  The church needs to re-learn this lesson today, as Heath explains in greater detail. 
            Our understanding of Mission must come from our understanding of the Trinity, and, if it does, then we will see a Church in loving community with all Humankind, with all created things, seeking the shalom of all so that all may worship.  If the Church can do this, then “that language of Love, understood by all, will be pouring forth its unconscious eloquence.  It is the man who is the missionary, it is not his words.  His character is his message.”[4]



[1] The word for “go” is in the Greek a circumstantial participle of time.
[2] “Send Me” by Lecrae, After the Music Stops (Reach Records, 2006).
[3] John Piper, Let the Nations be Glad! The Supremacy of God in Missions (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1993), 17.
[4] Bosch, 395.
[5] Ibid., 395.
[6] Kreider, Alan and Eleanor Kreider, Worship & Mission After Christendom (Scottsdale: Herald Press, 2001), 33.
[7] Ibid., 101.
[8] Ibid., 82.


[1] Elaine Heath, The Mystic Way of Evangelism (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008), 13.
[2] Ibid., 15.
[3] Evelyn Underhill, Mysticism (New York: Meridian, 1955), 71.
[4] Henry Drummond, The Greatest Thing in the World (New York: The Peter Pauper Press), 17.


No comments:

Post a Comment